Discussion:
HK: Anti-national education class strike gets support of university authorities
(too old to reply)
Peter Terpstra
2012-09-11 05:58:03 UTC
Permalink
Anti-national education class strike gets support of university authorities.
Colleges to help students and staff take part in today's anti-national
education class strike

Several universities have thrown their support behind today's citywide
class boycott - the first in 20 years - as the organisers warn of
further strikes if Leung Chun-ying fails to scrap the national education
curriculum.

The chief executive responded on Saturday to massive protests by giving
schools discretion to choose whether or not to teach the subject.

But Johnson Yeung Ching-yin, president of Chinese University's student
union, said as long as the national education teaching guideline still
existed in the education bureau's framework, it might still be put into
practice.

"We think that [Leung's move] is a fake withdrawal and fake concession …
they are trying to divert anti-national education [sentiment] from the
government to the schools," said Yeung.

The four-hour boycott starts at 2pm and a rally will be held at Chinese
University's "Million Boulevard".

The Federation of Students expects a turnout of 1,000 participants, and
says more and more student groups are signing up to join the boycott.

Sung Jao-yiu, president of Chinese University, said yesterday: "The
university has always respected freedom of expression … we will provide
the necessary help [to the federation]."

He also said that if academic staff decided to take part, they could
inform the school and arrange catch-up classes.

Similarly, Hong Kong University of Science and Technology (HKUST)
president Tony Chan Fan-cheong said his college "respects the students'
decision and will adopt an open attitude towards the strike".

"I admire their assertiveness in societal affairs. They show independent
thinking," he said.

Staff associations at City University and the Institute of Education
have issued internal e-mails to encourage academic staff to join the
boycott. Baptist University's staff union has also expressed support for
the action.

However, students at various universities had mixed opinions of the
campaign.

Brian Lo Hoi-yung, a final-year accountancy student at City University,
said the boycott was unnecessary as the government had backed down.

"This action has come too late. Last week, some activists did a [hunger
strike] already and the government responded by scrapping the three-year
trial period [for national education]," Lo said.

But Tony Lung Tin-keung, 20, a student at HKUST, disagreed.

"We understand that boycotting classes will not sway the government's
stance. But what we would like to show is university students'
determination," he said. "Even if it's just one primary school, we are
determined to give them the freedom of thought they deserve."

http://tinyurl.com/crpxh62

http://www.scmp.com/news/hong-kong/article/1033613/anti-national-education-class-strike-gets-support-university
rst0
2012-09-11 06:27:48 UTC
Permalink
Post by Peter Terpstra
Anti-national education class strike gets support of
university authorities.
Colleges to help students and staff take part in today's
anti-national education class strike
Hong Kong IS China. All China had to do is turn off the water, and
Hong Kong becomes a ghost town.

Unless these people have a place to go, they should think twice before
they do something to anger the Mainland leaders.
Post by Peter Terpstra
Several universities have thrown their support behind today's citywide
class boycott - the first in 20 years - as the organisers warn of
further strikes if Leung Chun-ying fails to scrap the national education
curriculum.
The chief executive responded on Saturday to massive protests by giving
schools discretion to choose whether or not to teach the subject.
But Johnson Yeung Ching-yin, president of Chinese University's student
union, said as long as the national education teaching guideline still
existed in the education bureau's framework, it might still be put into
practice.
"We think that [Leung's move] is a fake withdrawal and fake concession …
they are trying to divert anti-national education [sentiment] from the
government to the schools," said Yeung.
The four-hour boycott starts at 2pm and a rally will be held at Chinese
University's "Million Boulevard".
The Federation of Students expects a turnout of 1,000 participants, and
says more and more student groups are signing up to join the boycott.
Sung Jao-yiu, president of Chinese University, said yesterday: "The
university has always respected freedom of expression … we will provide
the necessary help [to the federation]."
He also said that if academic staff decided to take part, they could
inform the school and arrange catch-up classes.
Similarly, Hong Kong University of Science and Technology (HKUST)
president Tony Chan Fan-cheong said his college "respects the students'
decision and will adopt an open attitude towards the strike".
"I admire their assertiveness in societal affairs. They show independent
thinking," he said.
Staff associations at City University and the Institute of Education
have issued internal e-mails to encourage academic staff to join the
boycott. Baptist University's staff union has also expressed support for
the action.
However, students at various universities had mixed opinions of the
campaign.
Brian Lo Hoi-yung, a final-year accountancy student at City University,
said the boycott was unnecessary as the government had backed down.
"This action has come too late. Last week, some activists did a [hunger
strike] already and the government responded by scrapping the three-year
trial period [for national education]," Lo said.
But Tony Lung Tin-keung, 20, a student at HKUST, disagreed.
"We understand that boycotting classes will not sway the government's
stance. But what we would like to show is university students'
determination," he said. "Even if it's just one primary school, we are
determined to give them the freedom of thought they deserve."
http://tinyurl.com/crpxh62
http://www.scmp.com/news/hong-kong/article/1033613/anti-national-educ...
Satish
2012-09-12 05:55:17 UTC
Permalink
Post by Peter Terpstra
Anti-national education class strike gets support of
university authorities.
Colleges to help students and staff take part in today's
anti-national education class strike
Hong Kong IS China.  All China had to do is turn off the water, and
Hong Kong becomes a ghost town.
Unless these people have a place to go, they should think twice before
they do something to anger the Mainland leaders.
The big honchos of the CCP dictatorship in PRC are indeed a very angry
lot.

Like members of any other oligarchy enjoying dictatorial powers, they
might actually turn Hong Kong into a ghost town to give vent to their
rage and anger.

The CCP dictatorship in PRC is very much like the fake mother in King
Solomon's Court. If they can't bend the Hong Kong people to its
dictates, it might very well turn Hong Kong into a ghost town, as per
rstx's suggestion.
Post by Peter Terpstra
Several universities have thrown their support behind today's citywide
class boycott - the first in 20 years - as the organisers warn of
further strikes if Leung Chun-ying fails to scrap the national education
curriculum.
The chief executive responded on Saturday to massive protests by giving
schools discretion to choose whether or not to teach the subject.
But Johnson Yeung Ching-yin, president of Chinese University's student
union, said as long as the national education teaching guideline still
existed in the education bureau's framework, it might still be put into
practice.
"We think that [Leung's move] is a fake withdrawal and fake concession …
they are trying to divert anti-national education [sentiment] from the
government to the schools," said Yeung.
The four-hour boycott starts at 2pm and a rally will be held at Chinese
University's "Million Boulevard".
The Federation of Students expects a turnout of 1,000 participants, and
says more and more student groups are signing up to join the boycott.
Sung Jao-yiu, president of Chinese University, said yesterday: "The
university has always respected freedom of expression … we will provide
the necessary help [to the federation]."
He also said that if academic staff decided to take part, they could
inform the school and arrange catch-up classes.
Similarly, Hong Kong University of Science and Technology (HKUST)
president Tony Chan Fan-cheong said his college "respects the students'
decision and will adopt an open attitude towards the strike".
"I admire their assertiveness in societal affairs. They show independent
thinking," he said.
Staff associations at City University and the Institute of Education
have issued internal e-mails to encourage academic staff to join the
boycott. Baptist University's staff union has also expressed support for
the action.
However, students at various universities had mixed opinions of the
campaign.
Brian Lo Hoi-yung, a final-year accountancy student at City University,
said the boycott was unnecessary as the government had backed down.
"This action has come too late. Last week, some activists did a [hunger
strike] already and the government responded by scrapping the three-year
trial period [for national education]," Lo said.
But Tony Lung Tin-keung, 20, a student at HKUST, disagreed.
"We understand that boycotting classes will not sway the government's
stance. But what we would like to show is university students'
determination," he said. "Even if it's just one primary school, we are
determined to give them the freedom of thought they deserve."
http://tinyurl.com/crpxh62
http://www.scmp.com/news/hong-kong/article/1033613/anti-national-educ...
rst9
2012-09-12 16:15:07 UTC
Permalink
We know the reason for your anger, Satish.

You are nothing but a big disappointment to me.
You can't stand China's success, so you take it out on the CCP.

You are a complete failure, just like komin.

komin can't compete against the Chinese.
He feels he's completely surrounded by Chinese.

and You, you are a failure. You can not stand China's success.
l***@hotmail.com
2012-09-12 09:34:43 UTC
Permalink
Post by Peter Terpstra
Anti-national education class strike gets support of university authorities.
Colleges to help students and staff take part in today's anti-national
education class strike
Several universities have thrown their support behind today's citywide
class boycott - the first in 20 years - as the organisers warn of
further strikes if Leung Chun-ying fails to scrap the national education
curriculum.
The chief executive responded on Saturday to massive protests by giving
schools discretion to choose whether or not to teach the subject.
But Johnson Yeung Ching-yin, president of Chinese University's student
union, said as long as the national education teaching guideline still
existed in the education bureau's framework, it might still be put into
practice.
"We think that [Leung's move] is a fake withdrawal and fake concession …
they are trying to divert anti-national education [sentiment] from the
government to the schools," said Yeung.
The four-hour boycott starts at 2pm and a rally will be held at Chinese
University's "Million Boulevard".
The Federation of Students expects a turnout of 1,000 participants, and
says more and more student groups are signing up to join the boycott.
Sung Jao-yiu, president of Chinese University, said yesterday: "The
university has always respected freedom of expression … we will provide
the necessary help [to the federation]."
He also said that if academic staff decided to take part, they could
inform the school and arrange catch-up classes.
Similarly, Hong Kong University of Science and Technology (HKUST)
president Tony Chan Fan-cheong said his college "respects the students'
decision and will adopt an open attitude towards the strike".
"I admire their assertiveness in societal affairs. They show independent
thinking," he said.
Staff associations at City University and the Institute of Education
have issued internal e-mails to encourage academic staff to join the
boycott. Baptist University's staff union has also expressed support for
the action.
However, students at various universities had mixed opinions of the
campaign.
Brian Lo Hoi-yung, a final-year accountancy student at City University,
said the boycott was unnecessary as the government had backed down.
"This action has come too late. Last week, some activists did a [hunger
strike] already and the government responded by scrapping the three-year
trial period [for national education]," Lo said.
But Tony Lung Tin-keung, 20, a student at HKUST, disagreed.
"We understand that boycotting classes will not sway the government's
stance. But what we would like to show is university students'
determination," he said. "Even if it's just one primary school, we are
determined to give them the freedom of thought they deserve."
http://tinyurl.com/crpxh62
http://www.scmp.com/news/hong-kong/article/1033613/anti-national-educ...
The issue is quite actually quite simple. Do Hong Kongers want
Western style democracy?
If they do, national education is unavoidable. Western democracy began
with the simple idea of "one spear one vote." In another word, those
who were willing to kill and to be killed for the state were entrusted
the right to decide the affair of the state for themselves as well as
everyone else.
Peter Terpstra
2012-09-12 16:15:48 UTC
Permalink
Post by l***@hotmail.com
If they do, national education is unavoidable.
They have education but do NOT want the CCP brainwashing.
There should be NO place for propaganda inside a school!!!

Kind Regards,

Peter
rst9
2012-09-12 16:40:30 UTC
Permalink
Post by Peter Terpstra
Post by l***@hotmail.com
If they do, national education is unavoidable.
They have education but do NOT want the CCP brainwashing.
There should be NO place for propaganda inside a school!!!
Kind Regards,
    Peter
Well, you did excellently going through these "propaganda inside a
school"!!!
Peter Terpstra
2012-09-12 20:18:44 UTC
Permalink
Post by rst9
Well, you did excellently going through these "propaganda inside a
school"!!!
Indeed we had some Maoist propaganda, because some master where charmed
by Chaiman Mao. Later these movies where classified as Communist propaganda.

I even held a speech about the "long March" on information that was
coming from CCP propaganda. I did not know better, was just a young kid.

With Love, Peter

Loading...